Financial crisis rant

i know everyone is having a rant on this stuff, so i thought i'd be no different and give an entirely subjective and simplistic description of how i'm seeing things.

01. inflation & recession
how is it possible that deflation is occuring when all this money is being printed by the govs?
doesn't that normally cause inflation?

we're in a weird place where the value is dropping, but there's more actual money in circulation.

but the additional money injected actually has already vanished because it's already been consumed/lost. the money printing is just a time-shift correction, essentially to devalue what was previously overvalued.

if my apple is worth $1 when there is $10 in circulation...
and the government prints another $10. what happens?
the apple is (maybe) worth $2?
(of course, the apple is only worth $2 if the market will pay that)

and the $1 i worked hard to save is now worth relatively half. great!

which is maybe what leads to deflation/recession?
if noone will pay the $2, people have to start lowering their sell price...
to say $1.50 for the apple.

so everyone loses: the guy who had $1 to spend initially needs to borrow 50c to buy the apple.
and the guy selling the apple loses 25% of the value just to sell.
capitalist government rules, with a controlled population.

02. lending practices
the extra cash that caused it's way may its way into the economy via borrowing...
if i save $100 at the bank, they can lend 90% to someone else.
so if they lend the $90 to another bank, then that bank can re-lend $81 to someone.
which now means that the original $100 is looking scarily like $271.

plus the assets the money was borrowed against inflated to an unsustainable level and are now having to deflate.

the extra money being printed is being used to protect the lenders (aka risk takers) and to ensure they keep on lending. people were only borrowing on the premise that the asset they were buying was going to continually increase in value. there is now no cash left in the hands of consumers to drive growth (whatever growth means!).

03. peaking
so who/what decided where the peak was? i guess it happened when a large enough percentage of borrowers could no longer meet their commitments. then the highly speculative share market reacted, causing a house of cards. the whole thing relies on being able to find some chump to pay more for something than you did.

04. risk
now-days, the margin for error has evaporated. if you're only able to buy something based on the future value of something being a lot more than it is now... there is such a massive risk!

in the past, things weren't that heavily leveraged. you needed 20% down on a house and needed to be able to service the loan, without much reliance on the future value.

the time needed to save this deposit wasn't such a big deal because property value wasn't exponentially inflating. but because the lenders made incredible sums available, it's driven inflation through the roof. and instead of these lenders needing to deal with the problem, the government just bails them out else the whole system falls over.

chicken/egg. or maybe more cat chasing tail. bottom line, like steve waldman says, kill the lenders!

Currency Conversions

Why is it that every article written that quotes a financial value outside USD, feels the need to restate the value in at least one other major currency?

With the availability of XE.com and all the other information & tools on the Internet, surely this approach to quoting is out-of-date. Plus, with the fluctuations in currencies, the quoted information is wrong almost as soon as it is written.

Make it stop!